What Barack Obama’s reelection means for Texas

Last night, most conservatives were devastated to learn Barack Obama had been reelected as President of the United States.

As for me? Meh.

Frankly, in Texas, it really doesn’t matter who is president.

Our economy is strong. The Lone Star State emerged early from a nationwide recession with by far the best jobs numbers. Its thriving economy, low cost of living and low unemployment continue to attract disgruntled folks from other states.

Our leaders are strong. With conservative officeholders at the state level who are anything but shy and Republican majorities in both houses, we can be sure Texas won’t soon cave to political pressure. As David Guenthner of the Texas Public Policy Foundation noted on an election recap conference call today, our state election results were heartening: “Texas is continuing to chart a different path than the rest of the nation.”

Our continued emphasis on states’ rights is strong. President Obama will no doubt continue leading this country down the path of government growth, reckless spending, and increased regulation. But Texans are feisty. We will continue standing up to federal overreach – for the sake of our own state and all the others.

In a political sense, Obama’s win does matter for Texas. After all, a Democratic victory this time opens the door for a Republican one next time, and it could clear Texas’ candidate logjam.

I’m disappointed about last night. But I’m already looking forward to two exciting potential races: Abbott 2014, Perry 2016.

Make no mistake: Obama floundered in the Oval Office

I don’t know about you, but I’m feeling severely underwhelmed by President Obama’s flaccid response to the Gulf oil spill. He took advantage of a prime opportunity – speaking from the Oval Office – and wasted it by saying exactly what he’d been saying all along. There was no plan, no decisiveness. In fact, there wasn’t much of anything at all.

A recent poll stated that half of Louisianans think President Bush did a better job with Hurricane Katrina than Obama is doing with the oil spill. While Bush’s response wasn’t perfect, so far Obama hasn’t done much more than sit around with “experts from academia” who provided “ideas and advice,” not action. He exploited the disaster for a potentially approval-boosting photo op, snapped collecting tar balls on a Louisiana beach. Obama said, “The one approach I will not accept is inaction.” But 58 days after the spill, still nothing definitive has been done.

Obama has been spoiled by the Left-dominated Congress, sitting back and letting them carry out his agenda for him. This oil spill is the first time he actually has to act for himself. And he’s floundering under the pressure.

The speech was full of hyperbolizing (the worst environmental disaster ever?), demonizing BP, and reiterating lifeless promises. (And by the way, Mr. President, you don’t need to punctuate every single syllable with a gesture. We get it. You’re angry. You already illustrated that by kicking your rhetoric up a notch. By the way, how’s that ass-kicking coming?)

And after all that, Obama only met with BP for 20 minutes this morning – just enough time for another photo op.

I’ll give him some credit. He tried. And this time, his emotions seemed sincere. He wrapped up the 17-minute speech with an uplifting, religious hope (real hope, not Hopey-Changey hope) almost Reaganesque in texture. Obama gives the appearance of having everything under control… Now let’s see if he really does.

Obama: “I’m not just blaming Bush!”

This funny little piece has been making the rounds in chain emails. Thought I’d share in case anyone hasn’t seen it:

Press Secretary Robert Gibbs points out, “President Obama has been forced to clean up the mess left him by Washington, Adams, Jefferson, Madison, Monroe, Adams, Jackson, Van Buren, Harrison, Tyler, Polk, Taylor, Fillmore, Pierce, Buchanan, Lincoln, Johnson, Grant, Hayes, Garfield, Arthur, Cleveland, Harrison, Cleveland, McKinley, Roosevelt, Wilson, Harding, Coolidge, Hoover, Roosevelt, Truman, Eisenhower, Kennedy, Johnson, Nixon, Ford, Carter, Reagan, Bush, Clinton, and George W. Bush.”

Secure our borders!

In case anyone’s been living under a rock for the past few weeks, the Arizona immigration bill has caused quite a stir. If you pay any attention to the lamestream news, it seems Arizona’s Governor Jan Brewer and Sarah Palin (scroll down see her speak on the bill) are alone in supporting it. Suddenly everyone thinks that Arizona hates Mexicans.

But nobody’s even read it. Janet Napolitano, Secretary of Homeland Security, didn’t bother reading it. Attorney General Eric Holder, whosejob is to advise the President on legal matters like this one, admitted to not having read it. And judging by his recent comments, even our own President hasn’t read it.

Erroneous news reports are being cited over and over until finally they have become, in the public’s eye, the truth.

But this bill is not what people are saying it is. (And yes, I have read it myself.)

Here’s the gist: If you’re pulled over by the cops for a traffic violation or other offense, they can ask you to prove that you are in fact a citizen of these United States. Which pretty much makes sense anyway.

It’s exactly like the federal law. And there are no civil rights violations. You can’t get pulled over just for looking Hispanic on your way to get some ice cream, as President Obama oh-so-tactfully put it. In fact, it states rather explicitly that your immigration status may be checked if you are already suspected of committing a public offense. You cannot be pulled over because of your apparent ethnic origin.

If you don’t believe me, you can read the bill for yourself here. The entire thing’s only 13 pages.

SB 1070 does not infringe upon anyone’s rights, and Arizona is correct in implementing it.

If we can’t ask people from other countries to respect the law, how can we expect our own citizens to? 

See Sarah Palin speak on the bill: